The hell?
| Status: | In Transit | |||
| Shipped to: | ANTELOPE, CA, US | |||
| Shipped or Billed on: | Dec 19, 2005 | |||
| Tracking Number: | 1Z 0E2 5E4 D3 0609 218 9 | |||
| Service Type: | EXPRESS | |||
| Weight: | 4.40 Kgs | |||
| Multiple Packages: | 2 | |||
|
|
|
Package Progress:
|
||||||
Date/ Time |
Location |
Activity |
||||
|
Dec 19, 2005
11:41 P.M. |
|
ONTARIO, CA, US |
|
IMPORT SCAN |
||
|
10:25 P.M.
|
|
ONTARIO,
CA,
US
|
|
ARRIVAL SCAN
|
||
|
8:20 P.M.
|
|
CHEK LAP KOK,
HK
|
|
DEPARTURE SCAN
|
||
|
5:35 P.M.
|
|
KOWLOON BAY,
HK
|
|
PICKUP SCAN
|
||
|
4:29 P.M.
|
|
ANCHORAGE,
AK,
US
|
|
DEPARTURE SCAN
|
||
|
1:08 P.M.
|
|
ONTARIO,
CA,
US
|
|
THE SHIPMENT IS BEING HELD BY
BROKERAGE FOR REASONS BEYOND UPS' CONTROL |
||
|
1:07 P.M.
|
|
ANCHORAGE,
AK,
US
|
|
ARRIVAL SCAN
|
||
|
4:49 A.M.
|
|
HK
|
|
BILLING INFORMATION RECEIVED
|
||
|
Tracking results provided by UPS: Dec 23, 2005
3:35 A.M.
Eastern Time (USA)
|
||||||
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 09:40 am (UTC)Either that or it's Schrodinger's Laptop.
-kat
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 09:43 am (UTC)But it's all garbled together, which makes it frustrating trying to figure out when to *expect* the package, so that I get it and not our houseguests.
It's either that or it's Schrodinger's Laptop, which might be an interesting item to own. %)
-kat
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 11:39 am (UTC)A cat, though not a Jellicle?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 12:53 pm (UTC)Not to mention it's definitly in an indeterminate state, [one of the 50, but who knows which one.]
I think you have a name for it when it arrives.
I can suggest
Date: 2005-12-23 09:21 am (UTC)Re: I can suggest
Date: 2005-12-23 09:48 am (UTC)Well, it's funny if it wasn't my long awaited laptop, and I'm leaving home to go to the relatives for Christmas tomorrow, leaving me to wonder just when the package is going to be delivered, so I or my folks can be there to get it and not our houseguests.
-kat
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 05:16 pm (UTC)Besides, the Date Line doesn't quite make sense with the package being in Anchorage a minute before Ontario. Last I checked, Anchorage was behind us timezone-wise.
And I know in all seriousness it's either what you said, UPS getting things horribly garbled, or
-kat
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 05:07 pm (UTC)It originated in HK - Hong Kong. It was sent to Anchorage, Alaska because there's a massive UPS Hub/Sorting facility there and that's where the main UPS customs point of entry is. It passed the first scan and was sent to the Ontario, CA Hub,,,
And there if failed the second customs inspection, probably because the paperwork coming with it was bad, missing or incomplete. I'm guessing that Alaska lost the paperwork, or that the sheet that says the items do not contain Korean DRAM was missing.
It bounced. Returned to the Alaska Hub, it was shipped back to the sender. Who corrected the errors in paperwork and hucked ity back into the system. It is now moving towards you.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 05:17 pm (UTC)Thank you much. :)
Now, hopefully, UPS can give me an expected date for this package so I can get somebody in position to retrieve it for me.
-kat
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 05:28 pm (UTC)Order receieved in Hong Kong at 4:49 AM GMT+8 12/19.
Picked up from Kowloon Bay at 5:35 PM GMT+8 12/19.
Loaded onto aircraft at Hong Kong airport at 8:20 PM GMT+8 12/19
Arrived in Anchorage at 1:07 PM GMT-9 12/19.
Departed Anchorage at 4:29 PM GMT-9 12/19.
Arrived in Ontario at 10:25 PM GMT-8 12/19.
Scanned as an import at 11:41 PM GMT-8 12/19.
The only odd thing in there is "THE SHIPMENT IS BEING HELD BY BROKERAGE FOR REASONS BEYOND UPS' CONTROL"
Go Capitalist expansion!
Date: 2005-12-24 03:37 am (UTC)OORAH!
Re: Go Capitalist expansion!
Date: 2005-12-25 04:29 am (UTC)-kat
Re: Go Capitalist expansion!
Date: 2005-12-25 06:08 am (UTC)